Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (40196)	5/23/1999 12:52:00 AM
From: bobby beara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Haim, LU thread a real hoot, what a bunch of SAPS, you must have some agenda -ggggggg- You should have explained to them the relationship of high p/e stocks to high interest rates. LU looks quite vulnerable to me, it is sitting right on trendline, a break on volume would signal a pullback to the 43-47 area. bb

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (40196)	5/23/1999 3:27:00 PM
From: Judy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Hello, Haim Last we ran into each other was on the LU thread when I posted some reasons why recent longs in LU should be wary ... and was flamed for being a CSCO hypster. In actuality I am long both CSCO and LU and also trade both stocks occasionally. Message 9614782 The most vocal/emotional posters on stock-specific threads tend to be those who have not iinvested thru a prolonged bear market or traded a complete technical cycle, let alone a secular cycle. It is an unproductive use of time to engage in discussions with them ... those who refuse to listen to the market or to respect it will learn in time, or be wiped out. btw, your short LU/long NT strategy was indeed a decent paired trade if one legged in properly.