SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ETPI-Military Entertainment Enters Civilian Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Safe Cents who wrote (4344)5/23/1999 11:02:00 AM
From: wallstreeter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4767
 
hey marcus, i was wondering who ojha is. If he is doing what hes doing out of spite then i would consider that unethical. im not here to bash the company, im here to ask questions. If we have a basher here for alterior motives we should have him removed from this message board. We had one basher on the jnne board but fortunetly he hasnt posted here in a couple of days. if ojha is doing what you say hes doing than i think hes a sleeze-bag.



To: Safe Cents who wrote (4344)5/23/1999 3:43:00 PM
From: ithasnospaces  Respond to of 4767
 
Doug is a little busy running the company. The waterpark opens this weekend, he called me at 6:00 my time Saturday,still at the helm. There will be much media coverage, video, print and radio. Think that may be good exposure?

What, did his three hour tour run over?

If I was in Doug's shoes I sure as hell wouldn't care about coming here and having a battle of wits with the unarmed. How many CEO's post on their company's boards? None that I have ever seen.

Zing! Man you sure got me. BTW, several post on penny boards in particular.

The shareholders own the company. Sure, do you think Michael Isner cares what some shareholder that has 10 shares thinks. Or some daytrader that will hold for a week or two. I own 33,000 shares, but I don't get to make decisions about running the company. Like I said before, Doug will save hundreds of thousands in financing costs if the stock hit $1.50. That is direct to the bottom line. And his pocket. Butcher started the company from scratch 20 years ago and built it up.
Legally shareholders are part owners, but face it, ETPI is Doug's company.


Its Eisner dolt. Oh Lord, please provide me with competition worthy of the desire you given me to rid the world of incompentents.

OK here are some answers to some of the posts. The ETPI board was made up of all ETPI insiders. Doug thought it prudent to bring in some outsiders. Vernon Jordan wasn't taking our phone calls so he brought in who he could afford. By the way Vernon Jordan gets between $250,000 to $3 mil sit on other company's boards. The fact that Doug gave 50,000 shares or what roughly $10,000 to board members is NBD. No Big Deal for the uninitiated

OK Herr Doktor: Who on this board is independent? You mean he could only afford his wife? JUST ANSWER THIS ONE THING, please, oh so pretty please.

For all registered shareholders the proxies went out on time according to law. For the other shareholders there is no requirement to send out proxies. Doug spent $6K to do so. The company he hired to do so, dropped the ball. He regrets that they went out late. If he simply chose not to send them you wouldn't be bitching about it, right?

Marcus, I cannot believe you are defending this.

Look, there are only about 3 of you that are really bashing the company. One of you is Ojha from Canada that tried to extort 10,000 shares of ETPI for writing one press release that was never used and then promised Doug that he would bash the company on the boards. If you own stock and want to make a profit you wouldn't trash the boards, it makes other people not want to get involved and move the price higher. If you are a shorter, bring it on, when the next Qs come out I'll bring in enough buying to force you to cover. If you live in a glass house and like to throw stones, you're just an idiot.

There are many more that don't participate in the open forum. I have the messages to prove it, but that is really not important. There aren't that many in support. Lets count: Raise your hand if you feel that DOUB BUTCHER IS INCOMPETENT? Wait, I need a pad, eh.

Everyone wants to either make money or get their original investment back. Me included. If we gang up on the few who have a personal vendetta on our investment we might be able to shame him away. If not I know someone who get get names addresses and phone numbers from accounts. You have to consider it stealing from your family when someone just wants to tear down something positive that is 20 years old. How many of you bashers have your own public company?

I'm sending this on to SI management. This appears to be a clear threat. If you can't take the heat, can't respond in public to public discourse, then should I be shut up by force since you lack the substance to do it with knowledge?

Just my opinions, but at lest they are all mine. Comments? Something positive wouldn't hurt. To tired 4 spell check 2nite so save it, my Lakers sucked 2day.

IS THAT PUBLIC THREAT YOURS TOO?

Nospaces



To: Safe Cents who wrote (4344)5/23/1999 5:51:00 PM
From: ithasnospaces  Respond to of 4767
 
Everyone wants to either make money or get their original investment back. Me included. If we gang up on the few who have a personal vendetta on our investment we might be able to shame him away. If not I know someone who get get names addresses and phone numbers from accounts. You have to consider it stealing from your family when someone just wants to tear down something positive that is 20 years old. How many of you bashers have your own public company?

It hard not to stay angry at such threats. Do you send it to longs in companies you are short in? Do you send it to anyone who disagrees? Do you always send it in a blind threat fashion or do you sometimes send it with explicit details about how and in what fashion you will use addresses to intimidate/hurt/maim/kill? It probably always a safe blind threat...

Its really simple:

1. Doug Butcher is incompetent. This company will not progress until he is out of the way, regardless of your parroting his "progress words"...

2. Its my investment too and I want it to suceed, but when there is someone in charge who puts his wife on the board, how on earth can that be even remotely positive? or passive? it is clearly a huge negative and shows his disdain for the shareholders. I cannot it good conscious recommend it to others or remain silent hoping to get out and stick others. Thats for you and Gator.

Imagine what you will. Imagine that I'm Canadian or Texan. Import more ability to direct markets than any individual can. Misspell "Isner" all damn day. This company is where it is at because of DOUG BUTCHER. Period. I'm a convienent scapegoat because I'm angry about it. You're just shilling for shares.

Nospaces



To: Safe Cents who wrote (4344)5/24/1999 4:19:00 PM
From: Kelly Igou  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4767
 
Some very light buying and selling today - 5800 shares.

First time in a while we've had some buys.

People taking flyers on the prospects of a good summer at the park?

How can you lose at this level, when book value is what - .40?