SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George J. Tromp who wrote (2055)5/23/1999 9:11:00 AM
From: Andrew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2251
 
In other words severe dilution or give it away to a major.

Either way the shareholders lose

I was being serious by they way, I'd like to find a reason why I should own this at 11 bucks.

Andy



To: George J. Tromp who wrote (2055)5/23/1999 4:50:00 PM
From: .Trev  Respond to of 2251
 
Significant omission:-

REALITY!!!!!!!!!!

Have a good Day George. That was a VERY imaginative post!



To: George J. Tromp who wrote (2055)5/24/1999 12:39:00 PM
From: teevee  Respond to of 2251
 
George,

"Let me know if I left anything out."

In the context of Canadian law, the attempt by Aber's lawyer to argue and apply equity law to contract law, or to substitute equity law for contract law, or suggest precedence of equity law over contract law, will go no where before the bench. It is merely a boisterous ruse by Aber's lawyer. You heard it here first:-))
teevee


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News