Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jackc who wrote (31218)	5/23/1999 6:04:00 PM
From: eleebee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

To all that seek criminal action I hope you don't own the stock. As my mother is wont to say "you don't cut off your nose to spite your face". I am not a lawyer but if you read all the announcements that are in writing or by pronouncement they all are covered by the "foward looking statements" at the end of each and every one. As Cap'n Jack has said numerous times, he felt that JJ was a good manager but not CEO material. I don't know if he was right or not but the one thing we know is that he is self serving. Unfortunately this is true of most CEO's who feel the company is their own personal feifdom and do not work in the best interests of the stockholders. Again I do not see this as a criminal action, again IMO. I am all for JDN's solution, but not too hopeful of an outcome that will help anyone but the lawyers. I can not believe that TAVA and RS were not expecting a class action suit in our litigous society. eleebee

To: jackc who wrote (31218)	5/23/1999 6:19:00 PM
From: Captain Jack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Jackc --- <" I don't see much criminal evidence in Whitewater either but Starr is sure extracting that "pound of flesh" I was talking about.....jc"> To what good is Starr doing anything? Should possibly Starr be investigated. I am not defensive,,, nothing to be defensive about. When I questioned the job jj was doing as CEO and twice suggested options be tied to stock holder equity everyone here thought that was a terrible idea. The share price may have moved higher were things different over a year ago IMO. After that time my projection kept dropping to where there was hope for a spike to 9 - 10 before retracing to 5 after Y2K rev was completed. overall I did fine with TPRO/TAVA and only lost a little on my last purchase. jj was just great keeping it in the 5 3/4 - 7 trading range for months. Do you think <"AMES and MVIS at about the same time I got in Topro. They have very little publicity and not many traders and short sellers. "> is a fluke or could mgmt style and financing methods play a roll? <"Your colors might show."> What the hell does that mean? Sounds like a statement from ds...