Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Coz who wrote (14274)	5/23/1999 6:51:00 PM
From: MINEFINDER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Many false statements will eventually be challenged and the challenges will be backed up with teeth. Go Figure that one out.

To: Coz who wrote (14274)	5/23/1999 7:08:00 PM
From: Kenneth R. Moss	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Coz, I have it figured out. The more that we can get all the fuzzballs such as Marco, MINDLOST, spuddle, witless-LOSER-drip, bulliesh**t, then the quicker we can get them off SI. It worked for a few days and wasn't it nice and quiet ???? Regards, Ken

To: Coz who wrote (14274)	5/24/1999 3:38:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

"What this Stagger Lee lawsuit (#reply-6126058) really says is the Medinah will not stand for people making false statements about their company" Oh, really? ... What about all the 'To the moon next week Alice' hyperbole up-thread, all the outlandish geobabble and rumours of Big Boys interest and imminent jackpots in the various court cases? ... I still ask, why StaggerLee? And I hypothesise this answer - Because he wasn't pumping the stock. Short of time here, we'll come back to this post, looking for insight into corporate/thread culture ..... cheers