Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (49219)	5/23/1999 9:23:00 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 67261

<<Neocon, I don't quite know what you mean here, but please don't go down that path of running to Jill just because someone doesn't agree with you on this thread>> No, a Go To netter is also using neocom.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (49219)	5/23/1999 11:00:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, I just mentioned that there is a poster deliberately mimicking my alias, said that it might confuse some people, and asked if something could be done about it. I don't think that that is unreasonable....

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (49219)	5/24/1999 8:42:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

At the risk of breaking my vow to tone down the rhetoric, I am responding to this post solely for the purposes of pointing out we have already been down the road about the "AMZN incident" as well. I strongly disagree with the poster's characterization of the incident and I am ready, willing and able to defend myself with SI administration if Ms. Harris cares to make it an issue. I think the "neocom" incident is an animal of a different stripe altogether and I don't blame Neocon for being annoyed enough to report it to SI. JLA