SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RDM who wrote (59476)5/24/1999 2:55:00 PM
From: RDM  Respond to of 1573922
 
The benchmarks on A3 board may be two revisions C3 production boards.

jc-news.com
99/04/24, 1:02pm - Yoavf tells me that this place (a vendor in Israel) suggests the K6-3-500 will be available in two weeks. Meanwhile, AMD released their K6-3P mobile chip at 350 and 380MHz. This puts AMD temporarily on top in the MHz dep't (and perhaps in the performance dep't, but nobody ever benches notebooks anyway), at least until Intel releases their 180nm 400 and 433MHz Dixon chips sometime next month. Also, regarding the early beta K7 preview mentioned elsewhere. I am trying to figure out the age of that particular revision -- Anand at one point mentioned that the earlier revisions of the K7 were buggy as hell, leading to an implication that those versions may have had to be crippled, performance-wise, in order to run at that point. I'm told that the BIOS date was from late March, but the interesting thing is that the board had etched on it "Fester A3". Now, we all know that Fester is the name of the boards that have been used in all the public K7 demos this year (well, AFAIK). Anyway, according to my secret spies, the actual final revision code (or at least, one very close to final) of the production K7 is supposed to be C3. Is this a hint? Draw your own conclusions here, but I think it's possible that A3 may be referring to this particular demo combo being two "bugfix" generations behind



To: RDM who wrote (59476)5/24/1999 3:02:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Respond to of 1573922
 
Re: "It the answers were correct it is unusual for a fast result to be wrong. Hence I tend to beleive the fast ones."

SSE drops triangles to makes its FPS benchmarks look better than they are. I wouldn't overestimate the value of the good K7 benchmarks.

Kevin