SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (59480)5/24/1999 4:14:00 PM
From: Burt Masnick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584744
 
Scumbria - As I have previously posted to you, Intel had a very sharp runnup to a local peak about 20 months ago - August of 1997. By using that point as your base you can prove any argument you want to make, because you are implying cause and effect. The stock ran up way too fast before that point and couldn't sustain that level. Using that point or the runnup last fall as your starting point for comparisons, is in my opinion, misleading. The very same argument can be made in reverse by using AMD at its various local peaks as a starting point.

But it suits your purposes so you continue to use that August 97 and forward time base. If you used a 3 year time base the results are much less supportive of your arguments so you don't use them. Interesting that you feel you have to rely on a fundamentally flawed technique to prove your point.

Good investing,
Burt



To: Scumbria who wrote (59480)5/24/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1584744
 
SCUMbria - Re: "If you don't see a correlation between INTC's malaise over the last 22 months, and K6- you aren't paying attention."

Paying ATTENTION ?

Pay attention to the FACTS:

Intel is UP 61% - that's a MALAISE ?

AMD is DOWN 52% - that may be TERMINAL ILLNESS.

Can't you see this ?

The Kflop 7 may accelerate the AMDemise.

Paul