Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bob who wrote (4629)	5/24/1999 8:19:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 18366

Well you see "bob" there's one little problem: I notice the presence of many of the (scumbag con-artist) "TokyoMex" shills on this thread. The very same ones in fact that were on the TAVA thread, and then then infested the HDIE thread (as I recall I correctly predicted the demise of that scam when it was trading at 8 a share). As I previously stated, I have no position in this stock and don't intend to take one, but I would not be surprised if - as usual - many small investors are left holding the bag. If I turn out to be wrong - well, then good for you.

To: bob who wrote (4629)	5/24/1999 8:41:00 PM
From: Savant	Respond to of 18366

bob, looks like the EEF wants it both ways, they want the ability to encrypt that material which they want to keep private, but they don't think others have the right to keep other material private. Interesting dichotomy. Personally, I think everything should be able to be encrypted, except that which is in the public domain. If an artist wants to sell his music to the music labels, more power to him/her. If they want free and open distribution, that's okay too. It should be their option, it is their material. Hopefully they will get a better return than they have gotten in the past. Just my opinion. Best, Savant