Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (10522)	5/25/1999 7:41:00 AM
From: Thor Carlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

TA: Zeev, now that you have a stake again in this mining claim of GPGI do you think this has an effect on your neutral bias for the stock? When you didn't own any shares on the last run up during the end of February and the start of March you mused on the TA and expressed concern over insider selling. At that time we had over a week of anticipation of a press release and thus a .02 cent per day ascent on the stock. This lead to speculation of the "pump and dump" conspiracy theory. Why would 100,000 shares get displaced daily, etc..... And finally the release comes out and we trickle back to .16 cents. Now (yesterday), no fore warning to what might be but instead a press release mid-day and we get 500,000 shares traded by the close. These stocks were traded after not before the latest press release. Apparently most of them buys at the ask. But unlike other stock action I have seen where constant buying at the ask has shot up a stock to a point of giving it the "pop" we all look for, GPGI action yesterday did not pop. It held back instead. Why? Ed Fishbaine has a few thoughts on this........ Example, what if I had made out selling some stock on the last run up at or near .33-.36 cents. Would I not try again to do the same. Is there a sell order in at .33 cents for a "all or none and good to cancel" from this same fellow who did it before? I guess today we will find the answer. If another 500,000 shares today trade below .33 cents then I will ponder [ like you before ] over the significant pressure of the trades below this level. Jack wants answers about credibility on past discrepancies. Harry's questions never got answered. Richard has given merit to one aspect but only one. Chuca has hope and faith. Zeev, you speak about a possible spiking of the punch bowl. Bob is still the loyalist.(verb not noun, sorry Bob for the confusion) I just want the truth and for people to take responsibility for their own actions. If an amount of goo at one unit per measure is worth $600,000 dollars then why have this as the yardstick? Why not say: we have $2,000,000 dollars worth of goo at a unit that is slightly 3 times this yardstick? Why has this unit of measure been chosen? Would one not chose a yardstick based on what one can produce on a daily or weekly basis? (proven production [check] and repeatability [checks]) TA: clearstation.com Thor Zeev, I am just another typing my thoughts down on "paper". It's all rhetorical questions. ;-)