Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (19122)	5/25/1999 7:38:00 AM
From: Tim Davies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

jim.. i think that to date so much of the dd that some folks have done must be very frustrating for them, in that the company ( for whatever reason) just has not been able to remove itself from the pinks. many of the pieces of information that do find there way to the thread are lost in some time warp that ge has its clocks set to. this is not the fault of the posters , and may in fact be not eventhe fault of the folks with the dd. event just seem to be out of the hands of ge in some key areas . it would be good t know what reality is so far as the bd report is concerned, and i think we get a hint of it from the recent submisions to the nasdq folks. if ge cant prove up the old numbers right now , then we have to accept this fact and move on. the company may in fact be able to develope and implement a plan that can see it last long enough to start the proving process. the key point that concerns me is that they cannot prove that they have any value in terms that the sec/nasdq regulators can appreciate. If the actual value was high, i think we would be up and running by now.. but then again what the heck do i know.. have a good one tim