SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeff Vayda who wrote (30902)5/25/1999 1:00:00 PM
From: quidditch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
I agree that it would be best if "rocket scientists" (as well as brain surgeons) stayed away from security-sensitive posts as well as English classrooms because you are certainly no grammarian.

Regards. Steven



To: Jeff Vayda who wrote (30902)5/25/1999 1:39:00 PM
From: Minnow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Jeff: Not all is out.

Much of the COX report was redacted before release. The reason is that counterintelligence methods and sources cannot be revealed.

I don't quite get your point. Does all this not matter? Are you saying it is not true? Are you trashing the Republicans?

Before my current obsession with the market, I used to argue politics all the time. I am most certain I was right on most issues but there was little satisfaction as there was no definitive scorekeeping system. I now talk about stocks all the time and am gratified that the market has proved me right or wrong. Mostly right thanks to investments like QCOM!

Regards,

Minnow



To: Jeff Vayda who wrote (30902)5/25/1999 3:01:00 PM
From: scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
"if you believe the Republicans - The Chinese already have the keys to the store!"
Simply amazing that idiots will take the Cox report info and claim that it is a partisan Republican attack. Fact: The Cox report is nonpartisan. Fact: Security loss has been SUBSTANTIAL!!! Fact: The U.S. is substantially less secure (safe) because of the lax security under the Clinton administration (security loss occurred under Bush and Reagan too, but under Clinton the Security measures where "hyper" relaxed.