Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark garner who wrote (487)	5/25/1999 6:19:00 PM
From: Noneyet	Respond to of 2891

I thought I would borrow two posts from a Mr. Roger Bass who's explanation of some of Ftel's SEC filings was much more eloquent than I could have dreamed of. My apologies to Roger. The reason I am reposting them has direct bearing on the recent FCM filings for registration of 6,254,000 new shares to be used for employee options. I have posted regarding this issue previously. Taken from S-8 01/26/99 4,954,000 shares. Proposed maximum offering price $.44. Taken from the S-8 04/9/99 1,300,000 , Proposed maximum offering price $.44. If you can afford the time read them, they are worth it. Mr. Bass posts; exchange2000.com exchange2000.com

To: mark garner who wrote (487)	5/25/1999 7:25:00 PM
From: Noneyet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

Mark, you wrote >>>>>>now, when confronted with bullshit, remember the facts. look at the past 4 qtrly revenues and earnings as shown in the 10Qs. dont pay attention to the scare tactics.<<<<<<<<< Scare tactics / BS, I don't think so, It is confirmed via a phone conversation with the court of jurisdiction, that a motion for Injunctive Relief was filed on May 13, 1999 against James L. Magruder and John Does numbers 1-10. I have no idea until I get the documents of the contents therein. However, the above is not scare tactics nor BS, it is fact. I guess there is some type of confusion. ftel.com