SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (81578)5/25/1999 10:41:00 PM
From: GP Kavanaugh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria,

I must say that I actually appreciate the counter view point that you present on this thread. It would be much less fun if everybody was just talking about how great INTC was. I also understand shareholder loyalty, but the bottom line is shareholders want to maximize ROI. Do you think INTC is going out of business. If it hit 40 would you buy? Personally I prefer INTC to AMD, and I look at INTC as more of a buy and hold, and AMD as a trading opportunity, but if I see INTC in the low 40's it's going to be like a lottery ticket, and if I AMD ever hits 10 I'll be sure to pick some up.

GP



To: Scumbria who wrote (81578)5/25/1999 11:38:00 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "AMD would have been very happy to sell CPUs for $400, but Intel was unwilling to give up any market share. "

AAAAAAAaaaaaaaah..... I'm shocked. Who would ever have thought Intel would do such a mean thing??? They're supposed to be nice and help their competition succeed. After all, that's what it's all about, isn't it?

EP



To: Scumbria who wrote (81578)5/26/1999 12:36:00 AM
From: dumbmoney  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria, if AMD wants to sell CPUs for $400 they should halt construction of the Dresden fab immediately. There is way too much capacity coming on line. It's suicide.