To: Mary Cluney who wrote (2737 ) 5/26/1999 12:32:00 PM From: Jim S Respond to of 17683
... Where I differ with you is how to not only maintain our way of life but to improve it and how to increase our prosperity... ... We must maintain our humanity, our openness, our stringent respect for the law. We must not give in to hate, fear, and suspicion... Sigh. Ok, Mary, I repeat: we disagree. I am a realist, and don't share your opinion that "if only we could all just make nice to one another, we could all live in a warmhearted, soft, and fuzzy little world." I can promise you that the Chinese do not concern themselves with whether or not they might hurt our tender little feelings in their dealings with us. And, they are quick to embrace and use the emotion of any who will permit it. No offense intended, but this includes you. Your words sound nice, and have a most genteel ring to them, but people with your opinions and attitudes are quickly taken advantage of in international negotiations. In our dealings with other nations, we must always be pragmatic and constantly vigilant. This is especially true in our dealings with nations that don't share our sense of values. If you want to call that racist, we have something else to disagree about, and the foreign power will be quick to embrace your allegation. I must admit, you lost me with:But where I strongly disagree with you is where you would take us with your brand of patriotism. Perhaps you could enlighten me a bit by defining the different brands of patriotism? My confusion stems from my belief that patriotism is simply a desire to further the cause of one's own country, and that the causes of other nations are secondary to that. If "another brand" of patriotism would include "Jane Fonda-ish" beliefs, we have another item to add to our list of disagreements, for I consider that an oxymoron. Which leads us right back to the "Clintonesque" foreign policy and my allegation of his treason. While you may not like where "my brand of patriotism" would take us, I submit that it is precisely "my brand" that has brought this country to where it is. Rather, where it WAS before the Clown In Charge began to diminish us in both real and subjective terms. As you can see, Mary, I'm a sensitive 90's kind of a guy. So, can't we all just get along? <pardon the snickering.> jim