Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DSPetry who wrote (22958)	5/26/1999 1:55:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

A curious response, since I said nothing about Mr. Dobry's work. Nothing at all. I don't critique stuff by people who are not artists. I never have. The only work I critique is my own. Mr. Dobry is of the opinion that a painting "paints itself". That's one way to look at it, I suppose. I guess that's kinda like his web site, eh? "Unintended" he says. That's good. That made me laugh. He's a leaf in the wind. There are people on this planet that think what they do is "unintended". Fortunately, I am not one of them. Good luck with your painting, Mr. Dobry. I hope you find whatever it is that you are looking for.

To: DSPetry who wrote (22958)	5/26/1999 2:21:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

Pugs let his SI membership expire (As have a lot of people recently) "His" membership? Sorry, it was David Shepherd's membership. How soon we forget. Oddly enough, he seems to have succeeded in "reviving" it for long enough to send a Nasty Message when Bizwire announced its lawsuit. lololol. Sorry, DS, he's lying to you again. TLC knows as much about Art as he knows about stocks! Every once in awhile Pugs gets something right. TLC knows a great deal about stocks, and as far as art's concerned, his work is extremely interesting. paintings paint themselves This is utter rubbish. To consider Pugs's example, Picasso: he was an incredible draughtsman; had fantastic technical abilities. Sadly, Pugs is clueless about technique. I've rarely seen worse composition. Did you expect Shell & her goon squad to applaud my work? There are plenty of artists I probably wouldn't have "liked" personally, and there are some of whom I'm quite fond whose work I think is awful. Frankly I'd expected Pugs's stuff to have a bit more to offer, in a weird way if in no other. As it is, it's unimaginative hack work. As noted: academic without even any technique. Sorry, DS. But as usual, I know what I'm talking about, and you and Pugs don't.