SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ausdauer who wrote (5816)5/26/1999 6:51:00 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Respond to of 60323
 
Aus, the simple answer to the Microsoft/Apple GUI issue is that the "look and feel" criteria was established by the court too long after the infringement took place. That is, the law was different when the damage took place. Second, there was a question as to whether the agreement between Apple and Microsoft allowed Microsoft to use the icons ONLY on its initial version of Windows, or whether it applied to later versions. The litigation was resolved many years later, only after Apple agreed not to pursue it, in return for Microsoft agreeing to make updated versions of its application software for the newer versions of the Macintosh system.



To: Ausdauer who wrote (5816)5/27/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Re: "The Microsoft Windows GUI does not share the same "look and feel" of the Apple GUI." I belive that both sides gave up when they realized that Xerox owned the rights to the GUI look and feel and that they had effectively placed it in the public domain. I was most surprised that Xerox didn't fight for royalties from both MSFT and Apple.

Craig