Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Pinnacle Oil International - PSFD (SFD Technology) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dilution who wrote (35)	5/26/1999 8:29:00 PM
From: raisinkane	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 51

I would be interested to know how PSFD obtained a percentage of Encals interest in Shoal point? If they paid money...why, if they thought the drilling location was so bad. Why not wait until a better opportunity? Did Encal buy in to a poorly chosen location just to get a share of additional acerage for the future. PSFD has never said their technology was 100% accurate everytime....maybe this was one of those times. The land position Encal aquired...are they going to be able to drill as the operator using PSFD?......If not...why invest in a poor drilling program to aquire lands you will not have any say in where future drilling takes place?.......raisin

To: Dilution who wrote (35)	5/26/1999 10:15:00 PM
From: Tim Davies	Respond to of 51

ok will do tim

To: Dilution who wrote (35)	5/27/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: Dilution	Respond to of 51

Don't be intellectually lazy concerning the SFD. Don't miss an important point on the SFD. It does not matter if the partners drill 100 dry holes, the SFD still replaces seismic as a structure finding tool. The SFD surveys 150 miles an HOUR. Seismic surveys 5-25 miles a WEEK. The SFD costs $5-$12 a mile. Seismic costs on average $5,000-$15,000 a mile. The SFD has no boundary limitations. Seismic is limited to the ground, access, etc. The SFD interprets in near real time. Seismic takes weeks to months to interpret. Seismic is $3-4 BILLION industry a year. The SFD has a $220 MILLION market cap. If I told you there was a company that with 4 planes, flying 150 miles and hour, 4 hours a day, 5 days a week, 50 weeks a year. This company would survey 600,000 miles a year. That is the EQUIVILENT of $6 BILLION worth of seismic (600,000 miles X $10,000 a mile average cost of seismic). That is 1.5 times the TOTAL WORLDWIDE SPENDING ON SEISMIC IN 1997. All in one company. And the company's cost to do this... NEAR ZERO. The partners pay for most of the cost. The company gets 8% gross override on all structures found and drilled. That is what you are looking at in Pinnacle over the next year or two. Get it? That is why I can laugh will all of you saying a black box bites the dust. It is a zero, etc., etc. You have not thought this out at all. They can drill the next 100 prospects and all come up dry and this stock will be huge. You will not find anyone who will say this does not find structure as good as seismic. There were 2 possibilities I always looked for: 1) This finds structure only and therefore obsoletes seismic. Worth a lot. 2) Finds structure and hydrocarbons. Worth a lot more! So... I don't care if it is possibility one or two. The stock is huge from here. Anyone read the Calgary Herald on Tuesday??? Here is Peter Cawardine, formerly VP Land, #2 guy at Encal. He said, "It's a technology that has merit for potential applications as a wide-area reconnaissance tool. We're still working with them after two years, if I can leave it at that." Hmmmmm..... Here is the manager of geophysicist at Renaissance, Garry Bilous in the same article: "It seems to show something, but exactly what it is, we're not sure yet... Our results are interesting... we've found some structures, so we'll keep working with it." Finally, Dan Topolinsky, formerly #3 guy at Renaissance, now president of Pinnacle, said on Tuesday in the article, "It is too easy to be skeptical." I repeat, I would have said "intellectually lazy." -Dilution Posted here and in the Canadian oil and gas thread

To: Dilution who wrote (35)	5/27/1999 11:52:00 AM
From: Dilution	Respond to of 51

Shoal Point analysis also posted by me in Canadian Oil and Gas thread: RIK, here is the scoop on Shoal Point. Call Pan Canadian and prove me wrong. I get this from Pan Canadian itself. Shoal Point had a fault running west to east. There were two zones of interest to the north of the fault. The upper zone was the primary zone and the one targeted by the SFD. Pan Canadian drilled to the south of the fault straight down. They encountered structure to the south of the fault that was unanticipated and they got lost. (This structure was the part tested in the press release.) When they got their bearings, they punched through the fault into the north. However, the thrust of the fault was not as steep as they anticipated and they ended up inbetween the upper and lower zones. They headed down from there and hit the secondary zone of interest, the lower zone. The SFD predicted the lower zone was dry. It has not been tested but it appears to be dry. (This in the press release is the testing to be done further.) The upper zone, the primary zone of interest as indicated by both seismic and the SFD, was never reached. The bore hole is too twisted to be used again to reach the upper zone. So they lick their wounds, never having reached the primary zone of interest. The question is, will they drill again? Don't know. -Dilution Disclaimer: For RIK, this is for educational purposes only. For everyone else, for entertainment purposes only.