SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Janice Shell who wrote (54453)5/27/1999 6:02:00 AM
From: Angel D  Respond to of 55532
 
Janice,

"And sorry: I've seen what's on view at Pugs's website, and frankly it just doesn't get any worse."

Surely, you'd have to agree that a scanned image of a photograph of an original painting doesn't do justice to the original artwork. To be completely fair in your assessment, perhaps you should stop by the gymn, where some pieces are on display, and view them in person. Take a friend or two.

(Sorry I called you "surely". It just slipped out. <G>)

Best regards,

AD




To: Janice Shell who wrote (54453)5/27/1999 10:26:00 AM
From: Spider Valdez  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
there was an art show in '92 put on at the 'world tattoo gallery' owned by another chicago artist, tony fitzpatrick. the gallery director called me and asked if i had a painting of elvis, i didn't, but i told him i did. it was a chance to show with some big names including ed paschke. i was a young artist and full of energy. i painted 'rock'em, sock'em elvis' in one night. it was sold. the buyer recently moved back to france & i bought it back from her for sentimental value. my dealer saw it and decided to include it in a showing in july to represent some of my earlier work. martin is a moron, it's acrylic on linen, not a litho....the painting was also shown behind an angry elvis impersonator who was rebuting the ALL ELVIS show as "blasphemy" to the king! ....'like i ever cared about elvis!
as faR as the bashers art critique, who cares? warhol? i was lucky enough to show with warhol in '92 as well, though major influences of mine are the chicago imagists, who warhol influenced, i only 'philosophically' agree with what warhol did, art is truth, therefore no 2 snowflakes are the same, each silk screen, though from the same screen, is still totally unique & 100% in-tune with nature. each screen has the ink hit it slightly different,. i paint, i don't silk screen, i don't 'copy' nature, i work like nature.
i suggest everyone get away from si, the suit from aznt is about to be filed, these goons are a total waste of time, as is s.i., in my opinion. don't email me their posts anymore, i simply don't care.

spider