Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (29133)	5/27/1999 6:45:00 AM
From: ztect	Respond to of 44908

Zeev.... No I do not mean just bb stocks.. I can also list a whole lot of Nasdaq issues as well which have become the domain of shorters, after being the playgrounds of over exhuberant investors hyped by pumpers.....like bids, rrrr, elon, sath....even aol, dell and many other volatile tech, y2k and internet issues. There is a distinct difference betw. destructive criticism and skeptical criticism. Questions asked to raise innuendo versus questions asked to reveal insights. Actually, I have less concern about the individual subjects of Gore's post, but I do have concerns about the gang nature of these groups, especially with the "leaders" who have large fervent followings. I'd also probably list a whole different set of participants on these threads than the group Gore has listed. I'd also assail the people who repeatedly make contentless posts about how enthused they are about a stock and keep stating how much they are loading up and buying. It would be a very interesting to do a retally of shares currently held by people participating in this grass roots effort. How many of these people to paraphrase sat tight? Plus there was no verification of the count in the first place. I just wrote a number of shares on an email and faxed it. My count was accurate...but in all honesty, why should any one believe me either? Now I still support Marty being on the Board because of who he has introduced (Cohesive, Hwang, G/H) to the company and how these introductions have helped shape the company's direction and b-plan into a (potential) integrated provider of internet products and services. If the pp holders or whoever are opposed to him and want someone of "stature", I suggest that they have Marty replace Rob Gordon's brother Micheal (or whatever his name is) and leave a fifth position open for this mythical person of stature, especially since I have no clue what Gordon's brother's qualifications are other than being Gordon's brother..which btw smacks of nepotism and, therefore, a lack of objectivity anyway... Thus, back to work... z (spelling not checked)