SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ruffian who wrote (31180)5/27/1999 3:01:00 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
The only thing that article tells me is that Motorola was desperate enough to drop its prices to get the bid. Even so, QUALCOMM continues to pick up royalties. One doesn't have to work very hard to see why QUALCOMM is a great buy at present prices. Its price-earnings ratio based on this fiscal year estimate is 46, at a time when its earnings are growing about five times that rate. An earlier response noted that the tech wreck may be over. Of course it is. Portfolio managers may tell you what they bought, but not what they're GOING to buy.



To: Ruffian who wrote (31180)5/27/1999 3:33:00 PM
From: DaveMG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Zimits and Synder said the chip giant beat out
Qualcomm (QCOM: news, msgs), Samsung, Sony
(SNE: news, msgs) and Nokia (NOK: news, msgs)
for the 1 million-unit CDMA wireless phone deal.


So what the hell is that supposed to mean? BAM won't be selling QCOM, SONY, SAMSUNG and NOKIA phones? BAM won't be buying phones a million at atime from anyone else? BAM won't be advertising anyone elses phones? What?