Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Enigma who wrote (10134)	5/27/1999 4:43:00 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 17770

The perverse side- effects of welfare have pretty much been accepted as a centrist issue...Were the GIs supposed to sustain even greater casualties, after horrific losses on the beaches, because of property?

To: Enigma who wrote (10134)	5/27/1999 10:27:00 PM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 17770

Ahh if only those pesky Germans couldve lined up in a field, instead of fighting tooth and nail in town and city. Maybe we should have left France to the Germans. Or to the Russians!

To: Enigma who wrote (10134)	5/28/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: Andy Thomas	Respond to of 17770

>>How about cutting welfare for single mums? << My guess is that - more often than not - these women brought upon themselves the misfortune of procreating with dogs, rather than REAL MEN. It would seem that these women should have been a bit more picky in choosing their mates. To be fair, where is the decency to be found in males who foster children out of wedlock? I suppose that the fairest way to reform welfare would be to start with the corporations - for in my mind they're the biggest offenders - and work down to the individuals "on the dole." FWIW Andy