Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (50061)	5/27/1999 10:35:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

I see. Thanks for the info. Its too bad. (Am I sorry to see him go? I should not lie about this.) I wish Daniel had backed off a bit. He likely had some good things to say. We'll never know.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (50061)	5/27/1999 11:37:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Well then, I did get him booted eternally, somewhat inadvertently. After he pulled the "neocom" stunt, I wrote an e- mail asking if there were anyway to get the person (whom I merely suspected to be Schuh) to stop what was clearly intended to harass me, and sow confusion. I got no immediate response. After it became clear that it was Schuh, I wrote again, pointing out the evidence that it was Schuh, mentioning his prior bad behavior, and establishing the grounds for a future complaint should he persist in certain behavior. I did not ask that he be booted, and I did not know that he had already been suspended.I was merely inquiring and establishing grounds should a complaint become necessary in the future. However, apparently, they verified his ruse, and became exasperated. After all, a suspension is supposed to mean something....