Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karl Zetmeir who wrote (3907)	5/27/1999 10:57:00 PM
From: Tim Davies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

ok that i can deal with.. i create technology companies ,and am a damb good inventor of math based imageing systems , and siesmic systems.. tech i understand.. but i see no real mention of why they can get more out of the rock than the traditional fire testing folks say is there, and is the tech so specific that it is designed only for this site etc.. as a tech proving itself i will go along with it.. as i have to do that myself , and no longer bother with the trust me thing tim

To: Karl Zetmeir who wrote (3907)	5/27/1999 10:57:00 PM
From: Tim Davies	Respond to of 5143

ps ..you will notice i cant spell.. but i can add tim

To: Karl Zetmeir who wrote (3907)	5/28/1999 7:24:00 PM
From: Mark Bartlett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

Karl, <<The catch is you are speculating on people and technology and not proven resources.>> Was wondering - how does MG know that they have the gold in this area,if they have not done the work to prove it is there? I am not debating the process (for the sake of argument, let's just assume that it is legit) - but it seems to me, that it does not matter what process you are using (heap leach, CIP, Knelson concentrator - or whatever) ..... you have to know, that what the recovery process is designed to recover, is actually there to recover. TIA MB