SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (50264)5/28/1999 12:17:00 PM
From: Bill  Respond to of 67261
 
I don't know. I didn't partake in it, but as I recall, Dan was the aggressor.

I love how you guys use these posts by other people to show how dirty I am.

Bottom line is that Dan brought on ALL of his own problems. Enough said.



To: pezz who wrote (50264)5/28/1999 2:20:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Wasn't any. JLA



To: pezz who wrote (50264)5/28/1999 3:20:00 PM
From: Bill  Respond to of 67261
 
Sorry for not responding, pez. I thought your question was rhetorical. If Dan asked that they stop posting that stuff to him, and they refused, then it was harassment. I don't recall Dan ever asking not to be posted to. In fact, to the contrary, he enjoyed egging people on so he could respond with vile insults.

So, no it was just the usual insult exchange, it seems. Not harassment.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News