Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron Bower who wrote (8606)	5/28/1999 1:18:00 PM
From: Stitch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9980

Ron; << I agree that there is no 'easy' answer to US/China relations. >> This certainly appears to be the case if for no other reason then the level of acrimony that breaks out here when the subject of China comes up. I kept trying to think of a way to post a view but decided it wasn't a discussion but more of an alley fight. Bosco was right to point out that the usual tit-for-tat doesn't work when engaging in debate over what the appropriate policies regarding China should be. (I am still trying to figure out how and why Bosco was mugged in this tussle. But then I do not really know much about the McDougal case and it seemed to be about that.) In any case gentlemen, as a long term poster and reader here I would love to see a better code of debate employed. I hate this one to end in this latest rubble. Best To All, Stitch I do want to say that I feel the WTO issue has been badly handled on our part.