Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (50318)	5/28/1999 4:05:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

I just spent a brief amount of time going back to the old posts. It seems to me that early on, long before the "unit" matter, Daniel was repeatedly posting the same things to many folk, often copying their own posts back to them sarcastically and time-after-time. This is particularly true, ironically, in the case of Bill Vaughn. It began the moment Bill asked Daniel not to attack him directly, but instead be creative. Daniel began to harass Bill endlessly. Daniel also repeatedly and brutally called Vaughn a "little liar" and I think this began before the "unit" matter also. Even so, there is a great difference between repeatedly asking a fella for his unit and repeatedly calling him a "little liar." I'm sorry, friend. I do not think you have much a case here. Nevertheless if you like I will try to make the point better. At this juncture I am about to go fishing. I would prefer to drop this entire matter. But if you want to press it, I think you will lose. I would certainly not hang a hope on the character of Daniel Schuh. (grin)