Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (50359)	5/28/1999 8:13:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Respond to of 67261

pezz, you're starting to spit again. Be careful of that keyboard. :-) You're right though, he ain't that clean. But I am! :-) Michael

To: pezz who wrote (50359)	5/28/1999 8:37:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Hah! JLA

To: pezz who wrote (50359)	5/29/1999 2:03:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I am not sure how a normally intelligent human being could not have the faintest idea of what I am talking about. You said that he did not start until after the "unit question" episode, and that he must have figured "what the hell?" That implies an excuse, or mitigation. I used my case to demonstrate the dubiousness of your laying the blame for Dan on others. If I misunderstood you, it is because you were ambiguous. I am happy not to talk about this any more, but you are wrong, I am that clean. It took months of Dan's harassment before I tried to drive him off of the thread, and even then I was more bantering, and less "nasty", than most of you guys, and certainly than Dan himself. I might say that bp is cleaner, but she has been somewhat irregular lately, and perhaps a couple of others are about as clean...