Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DJBEINO who wrote (46037)	5/28/1999 10:11:00 PM
From: TREND1	Respond to of 53903

WOW !!! Larry Dudash

To: DJBEINO who wrote (46037)	5/29/1999 12:12:00 AM
From: Carl R.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

No surprise there.... Carl

To: DJBEINO who wrote (46037)	5/29/1999 1:27:00 AM
From: DavidG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

DJ, So does that mean MU gets to keep the $ 1/2 billion anyway?<g> Nothing like collecting money and not having to do anything for it.:-) That should help their bottom line a little.<ggg>...and you "forever bears" thought MU management was stupid.<vbg> DavidG

To: DJBEINO who wrote (46037)	5/29/1999 10:37:00 AM
From: TheStockFairy	Respond to of 53903

TAIPEI, May 29 (Reuters) - Taiwan trade investigators ruled on Saturday that U.S. microchip makers were guilty of dumping DRAM memory chips on the island, just days after Washington proposed anti-dumping penalties against Taiwan DRAM makers biz.yahoo.com

To: DJBEINO who wrote (46037)	5/29/1999 12:54:00 PM
From: Fabeyes	Respond to of 53903

To: DJBEINO From: Fabeyes Saturday, May 29 1999 12:52PM EST -Preview- IBM has been heading that way for several months now. They are, as usual, far ahead of most of the world in producing "small" quantities of high tech parts. Their problem is they seldom go any further than a few a parts at a time. Is this a change for them?