Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (50374)	5/28/1999 9:34:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Bingo! You win the prize! I do respect the sacred things of those who respect what is sacred to me. That is why you, Lazarre, Pimac and other liberal types have been able to disagree with me but still get along. Neither Dan, Michelle or Looney are those types. And unfortunately Pezz, I don't subscribe to the theory that everything is relative. Not all men are murderers, rapists, adulterers, liars, perjurers, etc. and to justify the actions of a single scumbag by denigrating all men, all politicians, all past Presidents, etc., etc, etc. is inexcusable. Somethings in life are black and white and that is one of them. I ask for no quarter in such matters and I give none. Nevertheless, I will, my friend, agree to disagree with you once again and we will leave it at that. I will go even further and say, I did not mean to offend you earlier today and indeed I turned off my machine and walked away because I was tempted to do so. I apologize if you were offended or "harassed." But I will tell you honestly, nothing has changed in my viewpoint as to Dan, Harris or Looney. They will continue to get NO respect from me. I certainly hope you can respect that as I respect your position to the contrary although I find it hard to understand. Peace. JLA

To: pezz who wrote (50374)	5/29/1999 8:26:00 AM
From: George Coyne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<< So what if Dan was nasty we all are that's the nature of these threads. >> Incorrect. We are NOT all nasty. Personally, I would rather have not seen him suspended. He would have gone away eventually if he had truly been ignored (unless he is really mentally disturbed). It was irritating to have to flip through his meaningless, gross, childish posts, but as with anything else in this world, there is always a trade-off. G. W.