Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Luke who wrote (14520)	5/29/1999 12:18:00 AM
From: Coz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

like i said he put the whole trust fund in this stock because he was foolish to believe all the lies of the stock going to 7$ or some crap like that ...well the stock is now worth ZERO So someone made a bad investment decision about a stock that is NOT MDHM. Tim, you are spamming this thread. Why can't you point us to some verifiable facts about this stock instead of some guy that lost money on some other stock that is not MDHM? Can you focus in on this stock, or are you only hear to talk about other stocks? I don't wish to argue with you. It's just that you are hear saying you don't like this stock. So, tell me what is wrong with this stock. Do you have any facts that will help people make investment decisions? --Coz

To: Tim Luke who wrote (14520)	5/29/1999 12:22:00 AM
From: Coz	Respond to of 25548

it's called being around the penny block a few times...maybe you should take the blinders off and avoid penny stocks all together. We all know that the BB world is a dangerous place. These general statements are of little use. You are saying this stock is bad. All I'm asking is what facts are you basing this statement on. I would not go to you thread and blindly say that one of your picks is bad unless I had an armload of facts to back me up. Wouldn't you expect that from me? I am mere asking for a shred of verifiable evidence that something is wrong with MDHM like you are insinuating. --Coz