Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Booking Holdings (formerly Priceline) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: B. A. Marlow who wrote (1520)	5/29/1999 9:36:00 AM
From: Tom Hua	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2743

BAM, you sound quite angry lately, the pullback in net stocks got into you? I hope you'll relax and cool off over the long weekend. Have a good one. Regards, Tom

To: B. A. Marlow who wrote (1520)	5/29/1999 2:16:00 PM
From: Robert Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2743

Great post as always, BAM. <They're compelled to offer a combination of arrogance, specious data and insupportable arguments to scare longs, prospective investors and lurkers. Frankly, I've never read an honest presentation from a short who simply acknowledged the trade was put on simply to capture market volatility. Why say a stock is going to $50 if you intend to cover at $99? You just look dumb.> I am always amazed that some of these shorts think they can actually influence the market by what they post on SI. Come on! <remain a press release away from oblivion.> So true. These inets are news-driven, pcln more than most. Shorting pcln entails a risk/reward ratio that simply makes no sense to me. There are easier ways to make $!! That said, I think the shorts on this thread are quite 'well-behaved' actually, offer real content sometimes, and actually add to the thread. I mean, if Tom covered, what would we talk about? <g>