Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karl Zetmeir who wrote (3945)	5/29/1999 8:02:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

Karl, <<draw air tight patents>> There's no such thing, trust me. If economics warrant, there's almost always a work around especially in chemical process. Your other statement about other secret sauce aspects that work with the patent portion must be revealed to show reduction to practice, they must be disclosed. Your comments suggest to me that the patent is not particularly important to the actual process. A lot like Hewlett's more recent patents. The value for patent maybe more psychological than real IMO. PS, another thought. Do you really think that a chemical process that can be conducted in Mike's garage would escape the understanding and skill level of a major's scientific staff?