SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: freeus who wrote (129815)5/29/1999 12:27:00 PM
From: arthur pritchard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Freeus, Please do not blame Arthur for calling LT a ----. Arthur is away for the Holiday and without his Laptop believe it or not. I signed the Post and I'll shoulder the Responsibility. It was unfair and wrong to call someone a name such as I did and I'll pray that I will never do it again.

MY THOTS WITH REFERENCE TO LT in the week that I have been following the thread:

The reason you did not heed his advice is because he has not in the posts I have read ever backed up his statements with any facts or opinions other than his ramblings in order for people on the thread to make sound and rational TRADING BUSINESS DECISIONS. If he ever does that I have not seen it and until he does I will never ever follow any of his advice.

You as a Trader,you do research and study very hard to learn as much as you can about a decision you want to make and hopefully do not rely on random musings of someone that is invisible.

GW PLANNER ( A Friend of Arthur Pritchard Maybe not after he reads my post to him about WASH SALES )



To: freeus who wrote (129815)5/29/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: Matthew L. Jones  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Well I did bail my Dell at 44 1/8 (about an hour before the close on whatever day they were to announce earnings). I had seen too many other companies of late announce good earnings and still trigger a sell off. Problem is my system gave me another buy signal and I bought again at 35 5/16. Little did I know that after 4 straight days of selling off, some more institutions would start shorting 50,000 share blocks (via INCA) and drop the stock to the low 33's. Still, that wouldn't have been a problem except the good folks over at AB Watley decided to raise my maintenance requirement to 50%-- while I was long the stock! They had done it once before on a YHOO trade which overextended my position. (Note the problem wasn't caused by poor risk management on my part but on a "cheap shot" change of rules in the middle of the game). I always leave myself a little breathing room to allow for a drawdown, but when my brokerage decides arbitrarily to change the requirements it makes me wonder about their own financial capacity since they are guaranteeing the margin loan. They decided that now DELL, MSFT, and CSCO are all "internet stocks". I was fortunate this time to have some additional cash on hand from a real estate deal I closed, but last time it cost me $37,000 because of the increase in maintenance requirement on YHOO. Interestingly enough, within 2 weeks of the YHOO call, YHOO was making new highs and would have netted me $105K-- so really they cost me $142K!!

I hope that the SEC decides to do something about regulating fixed "maintenance limits" just like credit card limits, which allows us to plan our strategies accordingly and not be torpedoed by our brokers. Complaining to the NASD is a joke (remember who pays membership dues). NASD policing is like having the fox guard the henhouse. Right now they are just "screwing us fair and square".

Finally, I don't know who LT is, but it's real easy for someone who is trading on a shorter time horizon to second guess entry and exit points, however all serious books on the subject agree that the longer horizon affords the greatest profit potential with the largest drawdowns. Drawdowns are not really a problem if they are planned for in a comprehensive risk management strategy, however all the planning in the world will not hedge for a change in the rules in the middle of the game. In a year from now does it really matter if our basis in DELL is 35 or 45, when the stock is trading at 105?

Sorry for the long rant, but I'm just a little PO'd by the way the brokerage industry can cheat us and we really can't do a thing about it. Maybe if enough of us raise cain, things will change. I know some on the thread have suspicions that there is a method to this madness, but I cannot figure for the life of me what their motive would be since I trade directly using Real Tick 3 and access the markets directly through ECN's and MM's and they receive no orderflow payment. If some of you have any ideas regarding their motivation, feel free to let me know. Right now I am drawing a blank.

MLJ