SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pezz who wrote (50406)5/29/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
We were arguing about something. You made an "observation", if not an excuse. I took it, rightly or wrongly, to be an excuse for Dan's propensity to harass. I told you why it struck me so. Since I have a reputation for being preternaturally patient on this thread, it seemed to me reasonable enough to mention it in that context. If you had followed along, I gave a true account of my experience with Schuh. (I have no idea what beef you have with Betty, I was merely acknowledging that she doesn't usually engage in rough and tumble).In any event, I offered my judgment, just like you or anyone else, based upon my experience. You are a very silly man for asking me "who made you the judge of this thread?", as if you had been shy about accusing and condemning....



To: pezz who wrote (50406)5/29/1999 12:17:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
BTW, this is your statement that lead me to believe you were excusing him (among others):" I believe that Dan did most of his dirty work after the "what unit" over and over routine. "