SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : NP Energy Cp New -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fortitude who wrote (18305)5/29/1999 5:26:00 PM
From: R>G>  Respond to of 22810
 
Interesting article on MMs from the Undervalued Dog today. (Shorting)

Weekly Thoughts: Ways of a Market Maker
(http://www.dimgroup.com/articles/02.html)

I was an OTC MM for about 10 years ending in the late 80's. Since then I
have been strictly an investor. Since I have not been that up to date in
MM rules I will only make statements that I feel fairly confident are
still accurate regarding these activities. By and large most MM don't have
a clue nor do they care to learn, about the fundamentals of the stocks
they trade.

They just try to make orderly markets. When dealing with BB stocks it is
very easy for a MM to get trapped into being short in dealing in a fast
moving market. Reason being; most of the MM's in this stock are what are
called "wholesalers" this means they don't have retail brokers "working"
the stocks.

So they have to rely on what's known as the "call" from larger retail
houses. If a "Big" retail firm like an E-trade calls up a market maker to
purchase say 5,000 shares of a stock, they expect to get an "execution"
from that market maker. If he turns them down, or only gives a partial
then the "Big" firm will go to another MM.

If this second MM "fills the order" then that "Big" firm has a moral
obligation to continue to give future "business" in that stock to that MM
who performed (his life blood). This will go on until he "fails" to
perform and so on.

Contrary to popular opinion the "Big" firms Do NOT necessarily go to the
"Low Offer" to fill a buy order (Or high bid for a sell). The "Go" to who
they think will perform to fill the order and expect that MM to "match"
the "low offer" in the case of a buy (bid in the case of a sell). Even
though this MM might in fact be the "high bid" and not really want to sell
any more.

As a wholesaler he must perform or he will get a reputation as a
"non-performer" with the "Big" houses and will cease getting "calls" which
means he will soon go out of business. I mentioned above that this
activity is very significant to BB stocks. I say this because most of the
trades in these BB stocks are "unsolicited" and are done through discount
houses, ergo "Big" firms.

With the above groundwork laid, let me try to explain how market makers
get short even if they like the Company; Lets say that a stock (shell) has
been lying quietly at $.25 bid $.50 offered. A limit order comes into one
of the MM's to Buy at $.50 for a thousand shares. Prior to this trade that
MM may be "flat" (neither long or short any shares). He fill the order and
is now short 1,000 shares. He may raise his bid hoping to find a seller to
"flatten" out his position. But before he realizes it a wave of buyers
have come in and cleared out all the $.50 offers. Now the stock is $.50
bid .75 offered. Here comes that "Big" firm he just sold the 1,000 shares
to at .50 with another bid for 1000 at .75. He makes this print. Now he is
short 2,000 at an average of .625. The market keeps moving and now its .75
bid 1.00 offered. Now he has to make a decision.

Just like investors, MM Hate to take a loss. So 9 times out of 10 he will
now sell 2000 at 1.00 making him short 4000 but with an average .81. At
this time he would love to see a seller at .75 so he can cover his short
and make a few bucks.

But instead the market keeps moving up. Now it is 1.00 to 1.25 and here
comes the buyer again at 1.25. He doesn't want to loose the call so now he
needs to sell 4,000 at 1.25 to keep his break even point above the bid.
Now he is short 8,000. Market moves up to 1.25 bid 1.50 offer here comes
the buyer now he feels he must sell 8000 here because "stocks don't go up
forever". Now he is short 16,000. And so on and so on. If the stock keeps
moving up, before he realizes it he could be short 50k or 100k shares
(depending how big his bank is).
Finally the market closes for the day and on paper he may look all right
in that his "break even" price may be around the closing price. But now he
has to figure out how to entice sellers so he can cover this short. It is
important to note that if this happened to one MM it has probably happened
to most all of them.

Some ways MM's entice sellers; Run the stock up with a "tight spread" in a
fast market, then "open" up the spread to slow down the buying interest.
After it has "cooled off" for a little while lower the offer below the
last trade right after a small piece trades on the offer then tighten the
spread so that the sellers feel they can take a "quick profit" by "hitting
the bid" on the tight spread.

Once the selling starts the MM's will walk it down quickly by only making
small prints on the way down with the tight spread. Another way is by
running the stock up in the morning, averaging up their short then use the
above technique to walk it down in the afternoon.
Hopefully after doing this for several days, it will demoralize the
buyers. The volume will dry up and the sellers will materialize thinking
that the game is over.

Contrary to popular opinion, MM usually Do Not Cover in Fast moving
markets either Up or Down if they are short. They Short More. They usually
try to cover after the frenzy is out of the market. There are many other
techniques they use but the above are the most popular.
This technique works about 9 times out of 10 particularly in a BB market.
However that is because 9 out of 10 BB stocks are BS. Remember what I said
above. Most MM's don't have a clue as to the value of a Company until they
get trapped. If the Company has solid fundamentals and a bright future.
Then the stock will do very well. And the activity that caused the
situation will prove to even help the future stock activity because it
created an audience.

R>G>