Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kash johal who wrote (82083)	5/29/1999 9:00:00 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Kash, 2. Some folks are playing with a new SRAM structure that is based on a 2T cell. So this could well obviates the need for RDRAM. Assuming a 2x price differntial one can easily see the performance of a 128Mb SRAM system may be much much higher than say as RDRAM 256 Mb system with say 5-6 ns SRAM. Such high speed eliminate the need for seperate Video memory etc so a UMA can be effective. The SRAM system would run much faster than the RDRAM system, because of the much lower latency. There is no such thing as precharge or a page miss in SRAM. Scumbria