SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: robnhood who wrote (10477)5/30/1999 2:55:00 AM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17770
 
Hi rrman; Just picked up the latest Harpers, and it has the March 30 Noam Chomsky article in it, which you have all, no doubt, read already. I have been totally horrified by the US involvement in something that is clearly a violation of all sane principles of international relations since it began. But reading his writing (and I disagree with most of what he writes, probably, but I agree 100% with this particular article) got me ired enough to look up the Kosovo thread.

I just finished reading the last book in the second Foundation Trilogy, (written by Benford, Bear and Brin), and just saw the Phantom Menace. I really don't like the direction the US is drifting toward. It is so easy to believe that ones own actions are pure, but if one has the power to kill it is a dangerous and destructive thing...

The Current Bombings (March 30, 1999)
In the scholarly disciplines of international affairs and international law it would be hard to find more respected voices than Hedley Bull or Louis Henkin. Bull warned 15 years ago that "Particular states or groups of states that set themselves up as the authoritative judges of the world common good, in disregard of the views of others, are in fact a menace to international order, and thus to effective action in this field." Henkin, in a standard work on world order, writes that the "pressures eroding the prohibition on the use of force are deplorable, and the arguments to legitimize the use of force in those circumstances are unpersuasive and dangerous... Violations of human rights are indeed all too common, and if it were permissible to remedy them by external use of force, there would be no law to forbid the use of force by almost any state against almost any other. Human rights, I believe, will have to be vindicated, and other injustices remedied, by other, peaceful means, not by opening the door to aggression and destroying the principle advance in international law, the outlawing of war and the prohibition of force.
zmag.org

Getting off topic, I am still learning daytrading, and now consistently beat the market (about 3 cents per share). I am very close to beating commissions (3.5 cents), and I expect to cross over to professional trading in three months or so. Currently I am facing the problem of learning to alter my behaviour when spreads change...

-- Carl