To: ztect who wrote (29510 ) 5/30/1999 8:37:00 AM From: Zeev Hed Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 44908
ztect, I am not your baby nor do I appreciate your adulteration of my name. I have not offended you in any way, never called you names nor have I ever imputed nor impugned you or your motives. I disagree with your dictatorial methods, I believe you are leading many newbies to financial slaughter but I do that respecting you and your opinions. I expect the same respect from you. If you do not apologize, I simply will not respond to your posts, I have found it quite effective with other crass and crude posters. This all exchange started when you accused Sam for selling his stock and implied that the decline in the last few weeks was due to "large holders" like Sam and others on or off the thread selling their shares. I pointed to you the possibility that the decline is due to an increase of the outstanding shares by around 15 MM since the publication of the last registration statement for about 50 MM new shares. Don't you think that this is a very important bit of information? You and other ardent bulls on this thread would like to have all people with critical views of TSIG finances shut up, and when rational argument do not work, you resort to offensive language, not particularly smart. Look at the recent events, what brought about the move to get a respected member of this thread on the board? The fact that there was at least a perception that current management was more interested in their own financial well being than in the stockholders' well being. This revelation was due to critical posters and if the results of the board meeting bring Marty on the board, you may want to post a small thank you note the Ditchdigger and other critics. That would be the honorable thing to do, are you capable of such action? Respectfully, Zeev