Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: A Special One who wrote (3935)	5/30/1999 10:49:00 PM
From: Edward W. Richmond	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8117

A Special One, I do find your posts confusing. May 29th 11:52PM Anyone paying over $1.00 is overpaying. I'd buy Between 50 cents and a dollar, but not a penny more. May 30th 12:17AM I'd be reluctant to pay S1.00. I'll buy at 50-75 cents tops. I wouldn't buy the share over 50 cents May 30th 1:37PM I'll pay 50-75 cents and not a penny more. May 30th 3:45 I'd buy 50-75 cents. FINALLY Therefore I will not invest. I can't get a read on will you? won't you? and at what price? Also, the lack of sophistication of the Pyng investors will influence your investing decisions???? What happened to due diligence??? :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)

To: A Special One who wrote (3935)	5/30/1999 11:30:00 PM
From: LOR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

PYNG DOES have a poor way with words ! "A Special One", I suspect that Mike Jacob or his appointee crafted PYNG's April 9'th PR in such a way as to give the investment public at large the impression at first glance that all field trials were over while being careful enough to leave room for interpretation for what exactly he meant. I have come to think of Mike as being a tad to flamboyant and I personally believe that he feels compelled to walk close to the line when in my view it is unnecessary and possibly damaging to PYNG's long term reputation to try and blow the company's current position up into more then it actually is. I'm sure Mike would argue that in the end who cares if he has exaggerated from time to time IF the product turns into a real winner? WELL Mike, what about the the elderly investors who may have bought in last year thinking you were so close to large orders and who now may have to sell at a considerable loss in order to make ends meet because they can not hold out as long as you or I? LOR P.S.- Gee, take a weekend off and a whole slew of new posters show up to take over your position as "bad cop" on the forum!!! P.P.S.- Still, I'll eat my shorts if the stock drops below $ 1.00 as I think PYNG is much closer to mass production then I did a month ago and that the problem is controlling production costs as opposed to finding a "buyer". And by the way, I do not see any signs that any IO device competitor has made more progress then PYNG. P.P.P.S.- Mike, it is now May 30. Will PYNG achieve it's target of finalizing the "production" design by the "end of may"?