SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (50612)5/31/1999 2:53:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Such exasperating either/or illogic. Their are manifold possibilities to explain the difference, non of which have anything to do with control.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (50612)5/31/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I have read statistics that said that more pro- lifers are female than male, so I do not know what to say, not knowing the provenance of your article...anyway, gotta run, so do not be wroth if I do not answer immediately!



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (50612)5/31/1999 3:28:00 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Michelle, res- I read an article recently that said 67% of pro-lifers are male.

Where did you read this at Michelle, George magazine? :-)

Michael



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (50612)6/1/1999 9:31:00 AM
From: lorrie coey  Respond to of 67261
 
It puts the blaring reality in his face...domination is their life's blood!

-it is about male desperation and lust for C-O-N-T-O-L of Woman/Nature.

Why not? They've been able to destroy everything else on the Planet...

What's left?

Women.