Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (50632)	5/31/1999 5:02:00 PM
From: sandintoes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

To all the men out there, Michelle, I say if they don't want to have an abortion, they don't have to have one. R

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (50632)	5/31/1999 7:35:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Reasons that do not have to do with control: 1.) Men are more "justice oriented", women more "sympathy oriented", in their moral judgments; 2.) Men have a stronger sense of the fragility of societal norms, and therefore are more wary of anything which might damage a sense of the sacredness of life; 3.) Men are more prone to being informed about and thinking through public issues than women; 4.) Men are frightened by the possibility of women becoming hardened and heartless through the exercise of their "right to an abortion", thus coarsening the society as a whole; 5.) Men are trying to protect the potential fruit of their womb; 6.) Men are more responsibility- oriented than women; etc., etc., etc. Who knows if any of these are correct, but all are possible...

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (50632)	6/1/1999 11:52:00 AM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

>Lets just say the obvious poll bias retort does not fall within my realm of"manifold possibilities".< And neither does it fall within my definition of "manifold possibilities," Michelle. I merely assumed my giving you only one reason would reveal to you your “either/or” illogic and send you on the way to clearer thinking. I now see my optimism was ill conceived. >Drop the manifold and the "s" in possibilities and maybe you have something.< It should by now be evident to you that I was exactly right and that you were exactly wrong. >Yes, I agree with you, poll bias is a possibility! LOL (vaquished, yes out of boredom with this "debate")< Nevertheless I do not agree with your “either/or” illogic, and I as well as others have shown you that you have erred. So not only are you vanquished by boredom, you are vanquished by your own illogic- just as I have said from the beginning. You are blinded by a notion that pro-life men are pro-life because they are interested in controlling women, and your blindness has disallowed your thinking clearly on this issue.