SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (23449)5/31/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: ed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Well, the big problem for 3coms is the OS, its OS can not communicate with the desktop OS , which is window, while many users of PDA need to communicate with their PCs at home / office remotely. Besides, I know many hardware manufacturers
in Taiwan already had their PDA devices ready and all operated with CE, pretty soon we will see these PDA devices flooded in the market . So, in the future , we will have all kinds of PDA devices from different manufacturers , different name brands, but all operated with a standard OS, which is CE, and each PDA can not only communicate with each other, but the PCs at home , in the office.



To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (23449)6/1/1999 7:37:00 AM
From: t2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
Morgan, I wonder if we see strength in MSFT like we did last week. My previous posts does not paint that bad a picture for MSFT since they could still appeal any decision or remedy---coming from the judge it may not be too radical. I wonder if this is what has been driving the stock. However, such news about the judge's recent comments did not make the newswires that I have read. The big institutions may have taken the comments as a great sign and started accumulating in a big way. If we see continued strength, I think it will then blast to new highs very quickly---if the market in general behaves.



To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (23449)6/1/1999 11:58:00 AM
From: John F. Dowd  Respond to of 74651
 
SFD: Thank you for the informative article. JFD