SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (50802)6/1/1999 1:06:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Neocon, Article...

Alan Keyes
1. Memorial Day comment:

In the Chinese espionage scandal we are faced with the kind of
treasonous betrayal of our national interest that literally spits on
the sacrifices of treasure, and blood, and life itself, that have
safeguarded our liberty and security in the course of this 20th
Century and which we remember today. Now we come to the end of that
century and see the fruits that have been built up by those
sacrifices of the American people betrayed and surrendered to an
enemy that will prove to be utterly cold and ruthless once they are
in a position to do us real harm.

We should expect nothing else from the Communist Chinese dictators,
given what they are willing to mete out to their own people. But it
is the right, it is the duty, of the people of America to demand more
from the leaders who serve us.

If we are to learn the whole truth about the events of our national
betrayal, and react in a way that allows us to deal with the
consequences and safeguard ourselves, then the Republicans leadership
will have to wake up NOW or the onus will fall on us to take that
leadership, shake it out, and put in place people who will in fact be
determined to stand for this nation's truths and principles, and
fight for its survival. Because this is now what is at stake.

We must find out who is responsible and clean house. We must rebuild
our true intelligence capacity, which I believe has been
systematically gutted by these traitors. And we must begin, with
everything that is in us, to apply our technology to the one thing
now that I think can safeguard us from the consequences of this mess,
and that is an anti-missile defense system. We must do all of this
with great urgency if we are to survive as a free people.

We must use effectively the position we still have, in terms of our
ability to influence events and choose leaders. We must stop playing
games and acting as if we were in a time when business as usual is
good enough, and our politicians can come to us with their stupid
palaver about what they are going to do for us, and the money and
programs they are going to have for us, and all the other ways they
try to bribe us into passivity -- in the midst of a time when on
every front, in domestic and foreign policy, we are seeing that our
survival as a free people is at stake. We must respond to the
situation in those terms, and look for the leadership willing to call
it by its right name and deal with it urgently. We need,
particularly, to resolve to act and vote in the coming election cycle
as if it were the last election we will ever have. We must resolve
to act as worthy heirs of the liberty purchased at the great cost we
remember today, or we will soon lose that liberty and deserve to
do so.



To: Neocon who wrote (50802)6/1/1999 8:18:00 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Yes. Well the defenses change as the "facts" change. Straight out of the Clinton playbook. Even less than intelligent persons can learn by example. JLA



To: Neocon who wrote (50802)6/1/1999 9:27:00 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
I find it hard to keep up with the charges being leveled at my character. But for the life of me, I can't remember being on the Amazon thread as Michelle has charged. It is possible, but it's also news to me this morning. (Perhaps she could find the post for us.)

Nevertheless, you are right. Michelle is a hypocrite, inventing rationale that would justify her and Schuh's behavior, while criticizing the behavior of conservatives.