Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SRU-ASE : STARFIELD RESOURCES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CIMA who wrote (442)	6/1/1999 10:07:00 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1239

<<In response to post 439 on SI,Homestake never held the property.They had Inco's permission to look for a geological signature. Eventually Homestake proposed a $950,000 joint venture which was rejected by INCO.Homestake left Canada altogether a year later.>> Very confusing to say the least. This is from SRU press release: "In 1986 and 1987 Homestake Canada Inc. explored the Ferguson Lake property for its platinum and palladium potential. Homestake reported assays with results ranging from less than 15 parts per billion to 3,700 parts per billion platinum and less than 15 parts per billion to 15,000 parts per billion palladium from soil samples and ranging from less than 15 parts per billion to 2,800 parts per billion platinum and 760 parts per billion to 5,600 parts per billion palladium from rock samples taken from the hornblendite hosted gossans."