SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Marco Polo who wrote (60049)6/1/1999 1:30:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571169
 
Benjamin,

do you realize that it would take a 1500 MHz Coppermine to keep up with a 1000 MHz K7

I appreciate your enthusiasm for K7- which I share too. However, I don't think that bus speed will significantly impact the performance of PC benchmarks like Winstone.

But it will be very important when K7 hits the server market next year!

Scumbria



To: Marco Polo who wrote (60049)6/1/1999 2:17:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571169
 
Benjy - Re: "... do you realize that it would take a 1500 MHz Coppermine to keep up with a 1000 MHz K7? It's all in the system bus speed, fellas. Last time I checked, 133 MHz wasn't 200 MHz"

Perhaps you can explain to everyone how an Intel 400 MHz Celeron - with a 66 MHz bus outperforms a 400 MHz K62 with a 100 MHz bus ?

You could explain away this REALITY - couldn't you Benjie ?

Paul



To: Marco Polo who wrote (60049)6/1/1999 3:38:00 PM
From: Craig Freeman  Respond to of 1571169
 
Benjamin, re: "133 MHz wasn't 200 MHz". 66MHz isn't 100MHz either but in all the benchmarks I've read it only seems to boost performance by a few percentage points. I can't explain why but memory bus speeds aren't all that important -- at least with current CPU designs.

Craig