SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Harmond who wrote (59457)6/1/1999 9:18:00 AM
From: tonyt  Respond to of 164684
 
>Do you know how to post a link??

Cranky today?

Anyway, I don't spend all my time reading this thread, and I did't want to post an article that had already been posted, I thought I'd ask first.

By your response it hasn't been posted, so here's the article:

May 30, 1999

MARKET WATCH

Pop! Goes the Bubble

Related Articles
The New York Times: Your Money

Forum
Join a Discussion on Investing

By GRETCHEN MORGENSON

EW YORK -- Has E-phoria ended? Highflying Internet stocks
look mighty weak. Even on Friday, when other NASDAQ stocks
were strong, many Internet shares couldn't muster their typical big moves
up. As the week ended, shares of Internet concerns were well off their
mid-April peaks.

The Interactive Week index of 50 stocks is down 17 percent from its
highs, while Thestreet.com index of 20 Net companies has fallen 26
percent since April 12.

Battered E-investors are wondering whether the recent action is simply a
pause in an upward trend or the beginning of the end of a glorious ride in
these stocks.

While no one is certain, there is a host of reasons why the downturn may
continue. Broadly speaking, investing in Internet shares has changed. And
investors who don't realize that are vulnerable.

The factors working against these stocks are both macro and micro.

One of the big-picture problems is rising interest rates -- bad for almost
all equities, but especially damaging to stocks of Internet companies,
which rely heavily on debt to finance their money-losing operations. As
interest rates rise, these companies' debt costs do, too.

Recent figures on Web use are also worrisome. Merrill Lynch's estimates
of the total number of Internet users declined from 61.6 million in March
to 61.1 million in April. While Merrill's resident Internet bull, Henry
Blodget, cautions that one month may not make a trend, he points out
that April's drop was only the second such decline in the last 12 months.

Perhaps more significant than either interest rates or Web use, however,
is the shift in supply and demand that has changed the way these shares
trade. Simply put, there are many more E-sellers than there were before
-- a change, almost imperceptible, that is weighing on many Internet
stocks today.

Start with the throngs of companies taking their shares to market.
According to Commscan LLC, an investment banking research company
in New York, there have been 69 initial public offerings of
Internet-related shares so far this year. During all of 1998, there were
only 42 such offerings.

And while E-commerce companies accounted for 11.5 percent of all
new issues last year, excluding closed-end funds and American
depository receipts, Internet IPOs have accounted for 44 percent of new
stock issues in 1999.

Also adding to supply is the fact that as newly public Internet concerns
age, more stock hits the market from executives and insiders. These
individuals are generally prohibited from selling any shares until several
months after the IPOs.

Even as extra Internet shares flood the market, demand is drying up. One
measure: The money going into Internet-related mutual funds has
dropped from $470 million in the week ended April 14 to $34 million last
week.

Complicating matters is a small-picture issue: a dearth of natural buyers
-- the short-sellers -- waiting to step in even if these stocks keep falling.
Investors willing to risk their money selling stocks short must buy them
back later to close their positions.

As a result, short-sellers represent future buyers. But since so many who
bought this way lost their shirts betting against Internet stocks, few remain
standing or solvent.

At the height of the craze, Internet buyers were many while the sellers
were few. Now the tables have turned. Ah, well. It was fun while it
lasted.



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (59457)6/1/1999 12:50:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Oops sorry, take back my clueless post about net banking, the reason ntbk is up today is because e-trade bought telebank and since amtd already has an investment in ntbk it is M&A speculation. Well up is up at any rate.

BTW ivillage looks pretty good, I've turned bullish on that one.