Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Marco Polo who wrote (60116)	6/1/1999 5:54:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570977

Benjie - Re: "If you look at your benchmarks there, you'll see that in floating-point intensive tests, the K7 actually blows away the PIII and even the highly-expensive Xeon. So it's just the FPUMark test itself that is flawed, " I guess you can't read. P3 Xeon 500 1024KB 2580 P3 500 2550 Cool K6-3 550 1860 K7 550 1590 Why was the K7 FPUmark SLOWER than a K63 FPU mark - run at the same clock frequency? Why was the 550 MHz K7 FPUmark SLOWER than the 500 MHz Pentium /// And Pentium /// Xeon ? P