SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Vendit™ who wrote (2735)6/1/1999 4:58:00 PM
From: DOUG H  Respond to of 4711
 
I think there is a simpler definition, thesuarus anyone? OOPS, did I mispell thesaurus?



To: Vendit™ who wrote (2735)6/1/1999 5:48:00 PM
From: E  Respond to of 4711
 
I knew that.



To: Vendit™ who wrote (2735)6/1/1999 6:24:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4711
 
Will you PLEASE use spellchecker?

Q'µ°Ò¡B®õ° should properly have been spelled Q'µ°Ò¡B©õ°

¥Nªí³¡ªL'L½ is a misuse; you need the objective, not the nominative.

And for heavens sake, what did you mean by ¤¤µØ¥Á°ê¬O¥@¬É±Æ¦W²Ä¤?? SUBJUNCTIVE case, PLEASE.



To: Vendit™ who wrote (2735)6/1/1999 10:25:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4711
 
Vendit, here comes the English Challenged farmer to learn a little grammar, and all I see are hieroglyphics, what happened to The Queen's English?

Zeev