Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stormweaver who wrote (10917)	6/1/1999 7:23:00 PM
From: robnhood	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17770

<<<both "proud" sides are at war now >>> War doesn't quite fit IMO,,, we attacked them,, same with Iraq, same in Sudan, and Afghanistan, and Panama, and Grenada... War means to me that two sides are fighting each other... The closest it gets in all of the above cases are some weak measures at defense.. I believe that none of the above were declared wars, mostly because they are all unconstitutional...

To: Stormweaver who wrote (10917)	6/1/1999 7:34:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17770

I can't disagree with you on the face-saving aspect, but it goes both ways. Milosevic has also played almost all of his aces and it is now just a matter of the degree of defeat. However, the Rambuillet "ultimatum" was the result of Milosevic breaking his promises not to resume ethnic cleansing practices that he had agreed to halt last year. Personally, I'm all for calling up Clint Eastwood and doing a "Eiger Sanction" on Milo, but then I guess that's coming from my reactionary side... <VBG> But then again, it Milo knew that he was being personally targeted, it might adjust his mindset and willingness to come to terms. Regards, Ron